Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11 |
| 2024-04-16 | -- |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.21 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G's global score of 77.1. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's body is just a little lighter but a bit thicker than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11 version, offering lots of additional features.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a little more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a way lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a quite inferior pixels number per inch in the display, and they both have a display with the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with much more brightness.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has a lower video resolution and a camera in the back with a much lower 50 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.