Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 12 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has a global score of 91.5, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's 87.1 global score. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS, but Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has an older 12 version while Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Even though Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, we must note that it's also an older, just a little bit heavier and a little bit thicker phone.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit more vivid display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, and although they both have a display with the same size, a better amount of pixels per screen inch and the same resolution of 1080 x 2400, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has way more brightness. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with a much better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because although it has worse video frame rate, a smaller diafragm aperture and a tinier sensor capturing worse quality videos and images, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit better battery life than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.