Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 8.1 Oreo |
| 2024-04-16 | 2018-11-23 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.22 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.42 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro's 77.2 overall score. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is newer, but a little heavier and a little bit thicker than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the previous 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro has Android 8.1 Oreo version.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a sharper screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has a little worse pixel number in each inch of display, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400px resolution, a really brighter screen and a bit bigger screen. Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro features a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a lot better video quality, a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality photographs, a larger aperture for better low light captures and videos and a camera in the back with way more mega pixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit better battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 6 Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.