Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-04-16 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 12.32 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a little bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, with an 87.1 score against 80.3. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is notably newer, but a little thicker and just a little bit heavier than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a brighter screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has a just a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 has a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a superior storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra takes a bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a lot bigger sensor, a higher resolution camera in the back, a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features just a bit longer battery duration than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.