Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Forest green, Midnight gray and Polar white |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 283.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and ArmCortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, with a score of 87.1 against 76.6. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a newer phone, and it is also just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has Android 10.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 has a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9, because it has a larger aperture, a way better (4K) video definition, a lot bigger sensor which provides a much higher photo and video quality and a higher resolution back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.