Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, with a overall score of 87.1 against 81.1. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has Android 10 version, so it counts with a couple additional features and better performance. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra construction is way newer, a little lighter and a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much sharper display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro. Both have a better amount of pixels per inch of screen, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a screen of the same size. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has 6 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a little bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a back facing camera with a much lower 50 MP resolution and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor shooting way better quality pictures and a bigger camera aperture to take better images and video in poorly lited environments.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a very superior memory to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a bit superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.