Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2020-04-07 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Aurora blue, Glacier white and Interstellar grey |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, having a overall score of 87.1 against 79. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has the newer 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S has Android 11 version, providing the user a lot of extra features and optimized performance.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S features a much better processing power than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a lot better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S. Both of them have a same size screen, exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution and a greater pixels amount in each inch of screen.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features much more memory capacity to install applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots slightly better photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has better 60 frames per second video frame rate, a back camera with more megapixels, a larger diafragm aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations and a much bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9S counts with a bit better battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.