Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | Android 10 |
| 2024-04-16 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.95 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 2500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.60 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.4 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, with a global score of 87.1 against 83. Both phones in this comparison work with Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is a notably newer cellphone, and it is also a bit lighter and a bit thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T features a much better performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also has higher video frame rates, a more megapixels back facing camera, a much bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.