Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 8 has an overall score of 85, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50's global score of 81.2. The Apple iPhone 8 construction is a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Motorola Edge 50, although it was released 7 years before. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a sharper screen than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a better count of pixels per screen inch, a really larger display, a way higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and much more display brightness.
The Motorola Edge 50 and the iPhone 8 feature very similar memory capacity for games and applications, they have equal internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 8 counts with a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Motorola Edge 50 takes much better photographs and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same aperture, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way larger sensor shooting much higher quality photographs and videos and a way higher 50 MP resolution camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 1821mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.