Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 6.21 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max has an overall score of 84.5, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50's general score of 81.2. Despite of the fact Apple iPhone XS Max is much older and heavier than Motorola Edge 50, it's body is still a little thinner. The Motorola Edge 50 features a bit better looking screen than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a just a little inferior number of pixels per inch of screen and a bit worse 1220 x 2712 resolution, it also counts with a way brighter screen and a bit bigger screen.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 2 lesser processing cores and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Motorola Edge 50 shoots much better pictures and videos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have a F1.8 camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos and a camera with much more megapixels.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior memory to install applications and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.