Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 global score. The Google Pixel 2 body has the same thickness than Motorola Edge 50, but it's a lot lighter. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels, a just a bit better pixel density and a lot larger display.
Google Pixel 2 features a much powerful processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way larger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos and a way better resolution back-facing camera.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has an 85 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.