Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has an overall score of 81.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 general score. The Google Pixel XL construction is just a bit lighter than Motorola Edge 50, although it's a little bit thicker and was released 8 years before. Motorola Edge 50 features a little bit better display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a quite worse display pixel density and a quite lower resolution of 1220 x 2712px, it also counts with a larger screen.
Google Pixel XL features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower number of cores and 4 GB lesser RAM memory. The Motorola Edge 50 features a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 captures much better pictures and videos than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and video in low-light environments, a way more MP back-facing camera and a way bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photos.
Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior battery life than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3450mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.