Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than the LG V20's 77 overall score. Although Motorola Edge 50 is a lot newer than the LG V20, it's just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. The LG V20 counts with a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower number of cores (but faster) and less RAM.
Motorola Edge 50 features a sharper display than LG V20, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density and a bit worse resolution of 1220 x 2712, it also counts with a bigger display. LG V20 counts with a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a very superior battery life than LG V20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 features a much better camera than LG V20, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same aperture and the same video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a lot bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a much better resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.