Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 14 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Aurora black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| P-OLED | OLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 overall score. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is a lot older, a little thicker and a little bit heavier than Motorola Edge 50.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 50 has just a bit better looking screen than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a little worse pixels density and a bit lower 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit larger display.
The Motorola Edge 50 captures much better videos and photos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way more MP camera and a way bigger camera sensor.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a superior storage to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. Motorola Edge 50 has longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.