Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus's general score of 79.7. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 50 has the newer 14 version and Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11 version. Motorola Edge 50's construction is notably newer, a bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola Moto G Stylus.
Motorola Edge 50 has a brighter screen than Moto G Stylus, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little bit greater pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712px. The Moto G Stylus features a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Moto G Stylus has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 cores. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with just a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a way bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a back-facing camera with more mega pixels.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with improved battery life than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.