Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2018-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A7 (2018) has a general score of 84.2, which is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50's overall score of 81.2. Although the Galaxy A7 (2018) is much older than the Motorola Edge 50, it's body is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter. The Motorola Edge 50 features a better screen than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a little bit bigger display, a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a bit greater display pixels density.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a slightly bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A7 (2018) features a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a superior battery performance than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photos, it also counts with a way larger sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs, a way higher (4K) video definition and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.