Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is better than Motorola Edge 50, with a score of 91.8 against 81.2. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G's construction is way older, a little bit heavier and a little thicker than the Motorola Edge 50.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bit better pixels count in each inch in the screen and a bit higher 1220 x 2712 resolution. Galaxy A71 5G has a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Galaxy A71 5G has a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a tinier sensor taking worse quality videos and images, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the same video frame rates and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution.
Motorola Edge 50 has a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.