Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A80 is slightly better than the Motorola Edge 50, having a global score of 84.9 against 81.2. Galaxy A80's construction is extremely older, somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Edge 50. Samsung Galaxy A80 features a much greater hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50. They have a 8 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch of display. Motorola Edge 50 has a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Galaxy A80, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A80, because it has a 35% greater battery size. The Motorola Edge 50 has a slightly better camera than Galaxy A80, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments, a way larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a back camera with a better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.