Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android |
| 2024-08-08 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is much better than Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 global score. The Galaxy A90 5G is a notably older, heavier and a bit thicker cellphone than Motorola Edge 50. Galaxy A90 5G works with Android OS, and Motorola Edge 50 works with Android 14 OS.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a brighter display than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a little bit higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with slightly more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a lot better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy A90 5G features a camera that's just as good as the camera in Motorola Edge 50, although the Galaxy A90 5G has a back facing camera with a worse resolution, a worse 3840x2160 video quality, a much smaller sensor and a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking pictures in low light situations.
The Motorola Edge 50 features just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.