Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2024-08-08 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 11.66 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 body is way newer and just a bit lighter than Galaxy C9 Pro's, although it is also somewhat thicker. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 has the previous 14 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a higher 1220 x 2712 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a just a bit better quantity of pixels in each screen inch.
The Motorola Edge 50 shoots much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger aperture for better low-light photos and video, a back facing camera with a much higher 50 mega pixels resolution and a much higher 3840x2160 video quality. Motorola Edge 50 has a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola Edge 50 has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.