Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31s has a general score of 88, which is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 50's score of 81.2. Galaxy M31s is better than the Motorola Edge 50, we must highlight that it is also a much older, somewhat heavier and thicker cellphone. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy M31s has an older 11 version while Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because it has a bit more pixels per inch in the screen, a quite better resolution of 1220 x 2712 and a little larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy M31s has a little bit better memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy M31s counts with a way better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy M31s shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor providing a worse image quality, and they both have the same video frame rate, the same diafragm aperture and the same video quality, the Galaxy M31s also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy M31s has superior battery duration than Motorola Edge 50, because it has a 6000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.