Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 14 | Android 5.1 |
| 2024-08-08 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| P-OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 444 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.4 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 6.21 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 has a score of 81.2, which is a bit better than Galaxy S6 edge+'s 79.3 general score. Both devices we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Edge 50 has the newer 14 version and Galaxy S6 edge+ has Android 5.1 version, so it offers some extra features and some performance improvements. Motorola Edge 50's body is notably newer than the Galaxy S6 edge+'s, but it's somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier.
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ features a screen that's just as good as the Motorola Edge 50 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a little smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a bit better display density. The Galaxy S6 edge+ has a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 7 less CPU cores (although faster) and lesser RAM memory.
Motorola Edge 50 has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a way more mega pixels back-facing camera, a way larger back camera sensor providing a way higher image quality and a bigger aperture to take better photos and videos in low light situations.
Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal memory. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 67% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.