Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 14 | -- |
| 2024-08-08 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2712 x 1220 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| P-OLED | IPS LCD |
| 444 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 720 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a global score of 85.5, which is a bit better than Motorola Edge 50's overall score of 81.2. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's design has the same weight than Motorola Edge 50, but it's thicker. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM memory amount.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better looking screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a way brighter display, a quite better display density, a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a bit larger display. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 256 GB.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with improved battery lifetime than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better captures and video in low-light environments, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality videos and photographs and a way higher 50 MP resolution back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.