Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge is much better than Google Pixel 3 XL, having an 89.6 score against 80.7. The Motorola edge is a newer phone than Google Pixel 3 XL, but it's thicker and just a little bit heavier. Motorola edge and Google Pixel 3 XL both have extremely similar processing units, and although the Google Pixel 3 XL has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Google Pixel 3 XL has just a bit better display than Motorola edge, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2960 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. Motorola edge counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Motorola edge counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 31% greater battery capacity. The Motorola edge takes much clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, a same size aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola edge also has a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality videos and photographs and a back camera with a way better resolution.
Although Motorola edge is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 3 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 3 XL. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Motorola edge, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3 XL, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.