Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola edge has an overall score of 89.6, which is better than HTC U Ultra's 77 overall score. The Motorola edge design is way newer, but somewhat thicker and just a little bit heavier than the HTC U Ultra. The Motorola edge features just a little better hardware performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores.
The HTC U Ultra features a bit more vivid display than Motorola edge, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. Motorola edge features a way better camera than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rates, the Motorola edge also has a lot better resolution back facing camera and a much larger camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Motorola edge features a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than HTC U Ultra, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Motorola edge counts with a way better battery performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 50 percent bigger battery size.
The Motorola edge is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.