Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-05-14 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 18.58 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola edge is much better than Nokia 9 PureView, with a global score of 89.6 against 76.4. Motorola edge is a newer cellphone than Nokia 9 PureView, although it is thicker and a bit heavier. Nokia 9 PureView counts with a little bit better screen than Motorola edge, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2880 resolution.
Motorola edge features a superior memory to install games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB more internal storage. The Nokia 9 PureView features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola edge. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
The Motorola edge has greater battery lifetime than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola edge features a greater camera than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, the same diafragm aperture and the same video resolution, the Motorola edge also has a much larger back camera sensor which gives a way better image and video quality and a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Motorola edge not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.