Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a general score of 89.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy F62's overall score of 88.1. The Motorola edge construction has the same thickness than Galaxy F62, but it's somewhat lighter. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola edge has an older 10 version and Galaxy F62 has Android 11 version.
Galaxy F62 features a slightly better looking display than Motorola edge, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy F62 also has a bit greater pixel density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Motorola edge features a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy F62, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Motorola edge also has 4 more cpu cores (but slower).
Motorola edge counts with a very superior memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy F62, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 24 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB more internal memory. The Motorola edge counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy F62. Both of them have a same size aperture, a 64 mega-pixels back camera, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the same back camera sensor size and the same video frame rates.
Galaxy F62 counts with a much better battery life than Motorola edge, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.