Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-05-14 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.36 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Midnight magenta and Solar black | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 544.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 620 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.58 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 13.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.1 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola edge has a score of 89.6, which is better than Galaxy Note3's score of 77.7. Both phones we compare here have Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola edge has an older 10 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. Motorola edge's design is extremely newer than the Galaxy Note3's, although it's thicker and somewhat heavier.
Motorola edge counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has 3 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores. Motorola edge has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a bit worse display density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bigger display.
Motorola edge shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola edge also has a much better resolution back camera, a larger aperture and a lot larger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos.
The Motorola edge counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB and 256 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola edge counts with a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.