Search


Compare phones

Global Score
36.138.4
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
--2009-03-10
4.21 x 2.28 x 0.48 inches4.09 x 2.09 x 0.47 inches
2.79 ounces3.25 ounces
Black--
$ 100.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
3.2 inches3 inches
240 x 400 pixels 240 x 400 pixels
LCDTFT
146 pixels per inch155 pixels per inch
YesResistive
5.85.9
processor processor
GPU GPU
5.765.76
Storage
--51,2 MB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC external memory slot
1.320.4
Camera
3.00 MP3.20 MP
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
5.065.39
EDGE and GSMEDGE and GSM
SIMSIM
0.30.3
Battery Life
910mAh Li-Ion Battery1000mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
250 hours standby time
3.3 hours talk time
800 hours standby time
10 hours talk time
2.42.56
Other Features
BluetoothBluetooth 2.1
AccelerometerAccelerometer
FM RadioFM Radio

Comparison review

Samsung Star is just a bit better than Motorola EX124G, having a overall score of 38.4 against 36.1. Samsung Star is a heavier but a little bit thinner phone than the Motorola EX124G. Samsung Star and Motorola EX124G count with really similar processing units, both have a 0-Core CPU. The Samsung Star features a slightly better looking screen than Motorola EX124G, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact 400 x 240 resolution, the Samsung Star also counts with a bit higher count of pixels in each display inch.

Motorola EX124G has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Star. Samsung Star takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Motorola EX124G, because it has a better 3.2 MP resolution camera in the back. Samsung Star features just a bit better battery performance than Motorola EX124G, because it has a 10% more battery capacity.

Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Star is also a bargain compared to the other phones.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.