Search


Compare phones

Global Score
44.747.8
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
Android 2.3Android 2.3.6
2011-07-112012-03-06
4.59 x 2.28 x 0.53 inches4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches
3.88 ounces3.42 ounces
$ 100.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2.8 inches2.8 inches
240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
143 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
CapacitiveCapacitive, Multi-touch
5.96.4
Performance
Qualcomm MSM7227-1 chipset--
Single-Core 600 MHz processor Single-Core 832 MHz processor
256 MB RAM--
GPU GPU
6.847.02
Storage
--3 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
1.323.52
Camera
3.00 MP2.00 MP
640 x 480 (24 fps) (VGA) video resolution320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
5.615.06
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
3.33.4
Battery Life
1420mAh Li-Ion Battery1200mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
9.2 hours talk time520 hours standby time
15.8 hours talk time
3.22.88
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.1, EDRBluetooth 3.0
GPSGPS
Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer and Compass

Comparison review

Galaxy Pocket is a bit better than Motorola FIRE, with a 47.8 score against 44.7. Although the Galaxy Pocket and Motorola FIRE were released with only a couple months difference, the Galaxy Pocket is thinner and lighter. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Pocket has the newer 2.3.6 version while Motorola FIRE has Android 2.3, so it counts with some nice extra features and performance enhancements.

The Samsung Galaxy Pocket has a little more vivid display than Motorola FIRE. They have a same size screen, the same resolution of 320 x 240 pixels and the same pixel density. Galaxy Pocket counts with much more storage for games and applications than Motorola FIRE. Both of them have a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 32 GB.

Galaxy Pocket counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola FIRE. Both have 1 cores. The Motorola FIRE takes much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Pocket, because it has a way better resolution back-facing camera and a much better video resolution. The Motorola FIRE counts with longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Pocket, because it has an 18% larger battery size.

Galaxy Pocket not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it an obvious call.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.