Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 34.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2006-07-25 | 2019-03-15 |
| 4.05 x 1.73 x 0.66 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 3.60 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| -- | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 6.4 inches |
| 176 x 220 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 157 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 5.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| -- | 4 GB RAM |
| GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 5.76 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 18,43 MB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 0.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 1.30 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 220 x 176 video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 4.51 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 0.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 880mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 440 hours standby time 4.2 hours talk time | -- |
| 2.4 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 1.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| -- | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a lot better than Motorola KRZR K1m, with an 83.8 score against 34.4. The Galaxy A50 body is much newer and extremely thinner than Motorola KRZR K1m's, but it is also incredibly heavier. The Galaxy A50 counts with a much faster processor than Motorola KRZR K1m, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster).
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much sharper display than Motorola KRZR K1m, because it has a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a lot better pixels quantity per inch of screen. The Galaxy A50 counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Motorola KRZR K1m, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a really longer battery duration than Motorola KRZR K1m, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 880mAh. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a lot better camera than Motorola KRZR K1m, because it has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a much better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A50 costs a little more money than Motorola KRZR K1m, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.