Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.7 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-06-12 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.29 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Champagne pink and Midnight blue | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 150.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1520 x 720 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 271 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 632 SDM632 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 250, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.84 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3550mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.52 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3 has a general score of 80, which is much better than Moto E (2020)'s 69.7 overall score. Even though Google Pixel 3 is older than Moto E (2020), it's design is much lighter and a little bit thinner. The Google Pixel 3 counts with a sharper display than Motorola Moto E (2020), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a lot greater screen pixel density.
The Google Pixel 3 features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto E (2020), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 3 also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 3 features a little bit better camera than Moto E (2020), because although it has a camera in the back with lesser mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a bigger sensor taking better quality pictures and videos and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and video.
Motorola Moto E (2020) counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3, because although it has only 32 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto E (2020) counts with superior battery life than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 22% greater battery size.
Google Pixel 3 costs a bit more than the Motorola Moto E (2020), but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.