Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 66 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-01 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.12 x 2.84 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Gray | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 120.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 282 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 308 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.36 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 has a score of 77, which is better than Motorola Moto E5's 66 overall score. The LG V20 design weights the same than Motorola Moto E5, but it's somewhat thinner. The LG V20 has a more vivid screen than Moto E5, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V20 also has a much greater pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
LG V20 features a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola Moto E5, because it has 48 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V20 counts with a bit better CPU than Moto E5, and although they both have 4 CPU cores, the LG V20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Moto E5 counts with improved battery performance than LG V20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. LG V20 captures much better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto E5, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a lot better resolution back-facing camera, a larger diafragm aperture and a much bigger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures.
The LG V20 not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.