Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-05 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.13 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.28 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Bright cherry and Polished graphite | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1560 x 720 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL is much better than the Moto E6 Plus, getting a score of 82.9 against 73.4. Although Google Pixel 4 XL and the Moto E6 Plus were released only 2 months apart, the Google Pixel 4 XL body is just a bit thinner but notably heavier than the Moto E6 Plus. The Google Pixel 4 XL features an incredibly better display than Moto E6 Plus, because it has a much better pixels quantity per inch in the display, a quite larger screen and a lot better 1440 x 3040px resolution.
Moto E6 Plus features much more memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Moto E6 Plus also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a little faster processor than Moto E6 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 XL counts with greater battery life than Moto E6 Plus, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity. The Google Pixel 4 XL takes clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto E6 Plus, because although it has a back camera with less mega pixels, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and photos, a bigger aperture for better images and video in poorly lited situations and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.