Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-05-15 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG Velvet has an overall score of 87.1, which is better than the Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 global score. Although LG Velvet and the Moto E7 Plus were only released 4 months apart, LG Velvet is just a bit lighter and somewhat thinner. The LG Velvet counts with a much better display than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels, a higher pixels amount per display inch and a quite larger screen.
The LG Velvet features a bit superior CPU than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the LG Velvet also has more RAM memory. The LG Velvet counts with a bit better camera than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, and they both have the same resolution back-facing camera and a same size back camera sensor, the LG Velvet also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
LG Velvet has a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The Moto E7 Plus counts with improved battery life than LG Velvet, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.