Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 89.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-02-03 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | $ 279.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 270 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is better than the Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 global score. Galaxy S10 Lite's construction is a bit lighter and thinner than the Moto E7 Plus, although they were released only a few months apart. Galaxy S10 Lite has a better screen than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a way better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite bigger display and a greater display density.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Moto E7 Plus, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy S10 Lite has a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have a 0.5 inches camera sensor and a same resolution camera, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution. The Motorola Moto E7 Plus counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has an 11% larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.