Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-16 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S7 is a little bit better than the Moto E7 Plus, getting a 79.5 score against 75.7. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S7 is noticeably older than the Moto E7 Plus, it's body is notably lighter and somewhat thinner. The Galaxy S7 counts with a way better display than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a lot higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a lot more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Moto E7 Plus features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S7 counts with a bit better performance than Moto E7 Plus, although it has less cpu cores (although faster), they both have 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Moto E7 Plus counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh. Motorola Moto E7 Plus features a superior camera than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has higher video frame rate, a back camera with way more megapixels and a larger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.