Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is much better than the Moto E7 Plus's 75.7 general score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is a little bit lighter and noticeably thinner than the Moto E7 Plus, even when both were released only a few months apart. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Moto E7 Plus has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior processor than Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Flip has a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because it has a lot better count of pixels per inch in the screen, a lot higher 1080 x 2636 resolution and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bigger storage for applications and games than Moto E7 Plus, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Moto E7 Plus features a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent greater battery size.
The Motorola Moto E7 Plus shoots a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Motorola Moto E7 Plus also has a camera in the back with a much higher resolution, a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photos and video and a way larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.