Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.05 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Misty blue and Twilight orange | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1600 x 720 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 270 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 460 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 240, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 610 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a general score of 92.3, which is a lot better than Motorola Moto E7 Plus's overall score of 75.7. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip 5G and the Motorola Moto E7 Plus were released with only 1 months difference, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G is noticeably thinner and a little bit lighter. Both phones we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a more recent 11 version and Motorola Moto E7 Plus has Android 10 version, providing the user lots of additional features and a performance increase.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a more vivid display than Moto E7 Plus, because it has a much higher 1080 x 2636px resolution, a little bigger display and a much higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. Galaxy Z Flip 5G features more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a superior hardware performance than Motorola Moto E7 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has more RAM memory. Moto E7 Plus has a much longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh. Moto E7 Plus has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Moto E7 Plus also has a bigger aperture, a lot bigger camera sensor capturing lot better quality pictures and a much higher 48 MP resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.