Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Silver and Space gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| LTPS | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.18 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is just a bit better than the Moto G 5G, with an 88.1 score against 81.5. Despite of the fact that the Apple iPhone X is older than Moto G 5G, it's body is notably thinner and lighter. The Apple iPhone X counts with a more powerful CPU than Moto G 5G, because although it has lesser RAM memory and 2 lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
Apple iPhone X counts with a more vivid display than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater pixels density and a bit higher 1125 x 2436 resolution. IPhone X counts with just a bit more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Moto G 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Moto G 5G counts with just a bit better camera than iPhone X, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments and a way better 48 MP resolution camera in the back.
Motorola Moto G 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has an 84% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.