Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 522 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3430mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G is slightly better than Google Pixel 3 XL, getting an 81.5 score against 80.7. Even though Motorola Moto G 5G is incredibly newer than the Google Pixel 3 XL, it is way thicker and somewhat heavier. Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a little bit better processing power than Moto G 5G. Both have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Google Pixel 3 XL counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2960px resolution and a greater pixel quantity per inch in the screen. Motorola Moto G 5G has a superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 3 XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3430mAh. The Moto G 5G features a better camera than Google Pixel 3 XL, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Moto G 5G also has a bigger diafragm aperture and a way more MP camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.