Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4 XL has a general score of 82.9, which is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G's general score of 81.5. The Google Pixel 4 XL design is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than Motorola Moto G 5G, although it was released just a little over a year before. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a little more vivid display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the screen.
Moto G 5G counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Moto G 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. The Google Pixel 4 XL features a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
Motorola Moto G 5G features improved battery duration than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35% greater battery size. The Moto G 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G 5G also has a back facing camera with a much better 48 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.