Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Clearly white and Just black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G is slightly better than the Motorola Moto G 5G, getting a overall score of 87.5 against 81.5. Even though Google Pixel 4a 5G and the Motorola Moto G 5G were only released 1 months apart, Google Pixel 4a 5G is notably lighter and thinner. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android OS (operating system), but Google Pixel 4a 5G has a newer 11 version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10, offering lots of additional features.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little better performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has a higher amount of RAM. The Google Pixel 4a 5G features just a bit better looking display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better display pixel density.
The Moto G 5G captures just a bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same diafragm aperture, the Moto G 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Moto G 5G features a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. The Motorola Moto G 5G features better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.