Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HTC |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2017-05-18 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black, Blue, Silver and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| LTPS | S-LCD 5 |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 10.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is a little bit better than the HTC U11, getting an 81.5 score against 77.6. The Moto G 5G is a much newer device than HTC U11, although it's a lot heavier and noticeably thicker. The HTC U11 has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
The HTC U11 has a slightly better looking screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and more pixels per inch of screen. The Motorola Moto G 5G has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC U11, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G 5G takes much better pictures and videos than HTC U11, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same (4K) video quality and the same aperture, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a much longer battery duration than HTC U11, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.