Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-12-07 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The LG V30S ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola Moto G 5G, with an 82.5 score against 81.5. LG V30S ThinQ's construction is lighter and much thinner than Motorola Moto G 5G, although it was released 3 years before. These phones have Android OS, but LG V30S ThinQ has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM. The LG V30S ThinQ counts with a little bit better looking display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880 and a better screen density.
Moto G 5G features a superior camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Moto G 5G also counts with a lot higher 48 MP resolution camera.
The LG V30S ThinQ features a much better storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a very superior battery lifetime than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.