Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-12-07 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black and Gray |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| LTPS | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is a bit better than the LG V35 ThinQ, with a global score of 81.5 against 81.3. The Moto G 5G design is much newer than the LG V35 ThinQ's, although it is noticeably heavier and much thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ has a little sharper display than Moto G 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel amount per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2880.
LG V35 ThinQ has a better memory capacity to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the LG V35 ThinQ also has a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V35 ThinQ features a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V35 ThinQ also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Moto G 5G shoots clearer photos and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for taking photos and video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Moto G 5G features a very superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.