Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-12-07 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Cyber shade |
| Plastic and Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting an 81.5 score against 75.8. Motorola Moto G 5G is a newer and just a bit lighter device than nubia Red Magic 3S, but it's just a little bit thicker. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Motorola Moto G 5G has the older 10 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little more vivid display than Moto G 5G, although it has a bit worse pixel density and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, they both have a display with the same size. The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little better hardware performance than Moto G 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with slightly more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G 5G, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S captures slightly better pictures and videos than Moto G 5G, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture and a same resolution back camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a battery lifetime that is very similar to the Motorola Moto G 5G one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.