Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Black |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| LTPS | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A21, having a score of 81.5 against 76.1. Although the Moto G 5G is a better phone than Samsung Galaxy A21, we must note that it's also just a bit heavier and thicker. Both devices in this comparison review work with the same Android 10 OS. Moto G 5G counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A21, because it has a little bigger screen, a way higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and more pixels per display inch.
The Moto G 5G has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A21, because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A21 has just a bit better hardware performance than Moto G 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
Motorola Moto G 5G shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A21, because it has a larger diafragm aperture for better images and videos in low light situations, a lot better (4K) video definition and a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera. The Moto G 5G counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A21, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.