Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 12.98 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G 5G is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A31, getting a global score of 81.5 against 81.3. The Moto G 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy A31, we must tell that it's also a somewhat heavier and thicker phone. These phones come with the same Android 10 OS (operating system), so both should provide you very similar operating system features.
The Galaxy A31 has a little more vivid screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2400px, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the display. Moto G 5G counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A31. They have 8 cpu cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A31, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto G 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A31 and Motorola Moto G 5G both feature quite similar batteries performance.
Moto G 5G has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a camera with a 48 MP, the Moto G 5G also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.