Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-12-07 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.48 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Frosted silver and Volcanic grey | -- |
| Plastic and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| LTPS | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 619 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 12.98 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G 5G has a global score of 81.5, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's 79.4 global score. Although it's the best phone in this comparison, the Motorola Moto G 5G body is much older, just a little bit heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Moto G 5G has older 10 version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G 5G, although it has a little smaller screen, a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little worse display pixel density. The Motorola Moto G 5G has a much more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Galaxy A35 5G captures slightly better photographs and videos than Moto G 5G, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a higher 50 MP resolution.
Motorola Moto G 5G features a much greater storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. The Moto G 5G and the Galaxy A35 5G have incredibly similar batteries duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.